Skip to content
The UFO LibraryA rack of paperbacks on the UFO record
Back to the rack

The UFO Library: Radar and visual

Boston Stump radar incident (1996)

1996Boston, Lincolnshire, and The Wash, England, UKRadar and visualOctober 5, 1996Evidence rated contested

On 5 October 1996, police patrols near Skegness reported lights, and an air traffic controller saw a stationary radar return over Boston that the Ministry of Defence later attributed to St Botolph's church spire, the 'Boston Stump'.

The episode

The sightings began in the early hours of 5 October 1996 with reports from police patrols at Skegness on the Lincolnshire coast. Shortly afterwards, a controller at the Neatishead radar station noticed a stationary "blip" on the civil air traffic control radar at Claxby, near Market Rasen, in the position of Boston. RAF Waddington's radar later picked up a second return elsewhere. Lights were also reported over The Wash, the tidal estuary between Lincolnshire and Norfolk.

The official explanation

The Ministry of Defence attributed the radar return to St Botolph's church spire in Boston. The spire, known in aviation circles as the "Boston Stump", appears on some radars under certain propagation conditions. The visible lights were put down to other sources, including the bright star Sirius and Venus, though the lights over The Wash were harder to account for. A 23-page RAF report completed in November 1996 concluded that the RAF's low-key response had been fully justified. The report described the Wash lights as possibly "a distant celestial source".

Later disclosure and dispute

The MoD's UFO files were released to The National Archives in the 2000s and 2010s, and newspaper coverage of them revived the case. A 2017 report claimed that RAF officers had been "overruled at the highest level" over how the sightings were handled. That is a newspaper characterisation, and it has not been checked against the primary documents here. Sources also disagree on details, such as whether the radar base was in Lincolnshire or Norfolk, and whether the radar return or only the lights were the main feature.

Assessment

The case is notable mainly because it shows the British air defence system treating an unexplained radar return as a live alert, and because the RAF and the MoD gave a documented prosaic explanation for the radar element. The lights over The Wash remain the part with the least clear account. This entry relies on press summaries of the official material, so details should be checked against the National Archives catalogue before anyone relies on them.

Witnesses

Police patrols at Skegness reported lights. A Neatishead air traffic controller identified the stationary radar return on the Claxby civil radar.

Evidence

A radar return on the Claxby civil radar, a second return picked up by RAF Waddington, and a 23-page RAF report completed in November 1996. The MoD released its UFO files later, and press reports say the files cover the case. The primary documents were not reviewed for this entry.

Filed under

Watch

Tape to Tape / THE DLES - 02 Nov 2026 - Unofficial Northernlion VOD

Unofficial NL VODs11K views, 96 likes

Where this entry came from

ProvenanceAgent indexedUpdated 2w ago4 sources

Drafted by the archive's AI research agent from the sources below; corrections from readers are reviewed and folded in.

First indexed
28 OCT 26 // 02:19Z
Last updated
28 OCT 26 // 02:19Z
  1. Defence Ministry reveals its X-files on UFOs, Yorkshire Post
  2. MoD UFO files story (June 2017), The Lincolnite
  3. Skies full of mysterious UFOs, Great Yarmouth Mercury
  4. Boston Stump incident, David Clarke, David Clarke (drdavidclarke.co.uk)

Notes

  1. Defence Ministry reveals its X-files on UFOs, Yorkshire Post
  2. MoD UFO files story (June 2017), The Lincolnite
  3. Skies full of mysterious UFOs, Great Yarmouth Mercury
  4. Boston Stump incident, David Clarke, David Clarke (drdavidclarke.co.uk)

Post-Cold-War

Also on this shelf

Related cases, then more from the same era.

From the same era, Post-Cold-War. See the full timeline

Readers' notes

Corrections, memories and arguments from readers.

Spotted a mistake or have something to add? Suggest a correction or join the discussion.

Reader discussion

Sign in to join the discussion — registered readers can comment and vote.

Retrieving marginalia…