Skip to content
The UFO LibraryA rack of paperbacks on the UFO record
Back to the rack

The UFO Library: Radar and visual

Lincoln AFB Radar-Visual Case (1957)

1957Lincoln Air Force Base, Nebraska, USARadar and visualFebruary 13, 1957Evidence rated contested

On the night of 13 February 1957, control tower and ground-controlled-approach radar operators at Lincoln AFB tracked several objects trailing an airliner; three tower controllers and the base operations director also watched them visually. Blue Book filed it as probable balloon or aircraft.

Background

Lincoln Air Force Base in Nebraska is now Lincoln Airport. The case is catalogued by J. Allen Hynek as Radar-Visual Case RV-7, and the NICAP archive reproduces his summary. It is one of the radar-visual reports from the 1950s that the Air Force's Project Blue Book had to classify.

The sighting

According to the NICAP case page, the event happened at about 2:30 a.m. Several objects were seen trailing an airliner five to six miles behind it, and reportedly moved about twice as fast. Two radar installations were involved: the control tower radar, run by the tower's NCOIC, and the Ground Controlled Approach (GCA) radar. A discussion thread on UAP Discovery gives the same time and adds that the objects hovered, that one split in two, and that another turned through 180 degrees. Per the same account, the targets were watched for three to five minutes and returned no response to IFF interrogation. A third account, a RADCAT case-directory post on the RealTVUFOs blog, lists the duration as "3-5 mins" with a bracketed, questioned "[25 min]" in Brad Sparks's summary, so the duration itself is uncertain.

The radar operator reportedly said the blips were about the size of a B-47 bomber. Visual observers could not estimate size.

Official explanation

The Blue Book summary, as quoted by NICAP, says the objects were "visually observed by three control tower operators and by the Director of Operations." Blue Book rated the case "probable balloon" and "probable aircraft." Neither source names the airliner or describes a test used to reach that conclusion, so the explanation rests on the classification alone.

Assessment

The case is a multi-observer radar-visual report, which is why researchers cite it. Its documentation is secondhand: both sources read here quote Hynek and Blue Book summaries rather than the original file. The time and the count of targets are vague or differ between accounts, so they should be treated as reported rather than verified.

Witnesses

Three control tower operators and the base Director of Operations watched visually. The NCOIC of the control tower and GCA radar personnel tracked the targets on radar, per the NICAP summary.

Evidence

Radar tracks from two installations, with IFF interrogation reportedly receiving no response. No photographs or physical trace are reported in the sources read.

Filed under

Where this entry came from

ProvenanceAgent indexedUpdated 8d ago3 sources

Drafted by the archive's AI research agent from the sources below; corrections from readers are reviewed and folded in.

First indexed
04 NOV 26 // 02:18Z
Last updated
04 NOV 26 // 02:18Z
  1. Radar-Visual Case RV-7: Lincoln Air Force Base, Nebraska, Dr. J. Allen Hynek (quoted), NICAP
  2. February 13, 1957 — Lincoln, NE — Radar/Visual at Lincoln AFB / Balloon?, UAP Discovery contributors, UAP Discovery forum
  3. UFO Case Directory (RADCAT): Radar/Visual At Lincoln AFB February 13, 1957, Lincoln AFB, Nebraska, kl., RealTVUFOs (blog)

Notes

  1. Radar-Visual Case RV-7: Lincoln Air Force Base, Nebraska, Dr. J. Allen Hynek (quoted), NICAP
  2. February 13, 1957 — Lincoln, NE — Radar/Visual at Lincoln AFB / Balloon?, UAP Discovery contributors, UAP Discovery forum
  3. UFO Case Directory (RADCAT): Radar/Visual At Lincoln AFB February 13, 1957, Lincoln AFB, Nebraska, kl., RealTVUFOs (blog)

Early Modern

Also on this shelf

Related cases, then more from the same era.

From the same era, Early Modern. See the full timeline

Readers' notes

Corrections, memories and arguments from readers.

Spotted a mistake or have something to add? Suggest a correction or join the discussion.

Reader discussion

Sign in to join the discussion — registered readers can comment and vote.

Retrieving marginalia…