Skip to content
The UFO LibraryA rack of paperbacks on the UFO record
Back to the rack

The UFO Library: Sighting

Lockheed / Kelly Johnson UFO Sighting, 1953

1953Agoura, California (sighting near Long Beach, Pacific coast), USASightingDecember 16, 1953Evidence rated contested

On December 16, 1953, Lockheed Skunk Works chief Clarence 'Kelly' Johnson, his wife, and a Lockheed flight crew aboard a WV-2 Warning Star prototype each reported a large dark object that hovered for minutes and then accelerated out of sight over the Pacific.

Background

Clarence "Kelly" Johnson (1910-1990) was the Lockheed engineer who led the Skunk Works team behind the U-2 and the SR-71. In late 1953 he was chief engineer of Lockheed's Burbank plant, and his own memoir, Kelly: More Than My Share of It All (1985), is among the sources on his career listed on his Wikipedia page. The case is usually discussed because the witnesses were aviation professionals, not casual observers.

The sighting

According to the detailed account on the UAP Discovery forum, at about 4:58 p.m. on December 16, 1953, Johnson saw a dark, elliptical object from his home at Lindero Ranch in Agoura. He first thought it might be a lenticular cloud or a smoke trail. A Lockheed crew flying a Constellation prototype (Airframe 4-101), the forerunner of the Navy's WV-2 Warning Star radar aircraft, near Long Beach reported the same object, watching independently of the Johnsons. The crew included pilots Rudy Thoren and Roy Wimmer, and chief aerodynamicist Philip Colman.

The witnesses estimated the object at 170 to 230 feet across, roughly 15,000 feet up (plus or minus 2,000 feet), and 30 to 60 miles to the west. At about 5:04 p.m. it began a shallow climb and accelerated westward over the Pacific. The Johnsons watched for about four minutes; the aircrew for about six. The WV-2 crew put its disappearance at 10 to 13 seconds after the object passed 90 miles of altitude; Johnson, using 8x binoculars, estimated about 90 seconds. The estimates differ, and the witnesses themselves said they had no way to measure size, distance or speed precisely.

Documentation and the Air Force response

Johnson drafted a personal cover letter to the "Air Force Investigation Group on Flying Saucers" at Wright Field, the group that became Project Blue Book, but reportedly hesitated before sending it. Written statements from the crew and a Blue Book record card survive as scans. The Substack essay by John Mooner shows scanned statements and the record card, but the visible text is paywalled and does not transcribe them. The case is catalogued by Brad Sparks in his Blue Book Unknowns as Case 966, and Joel Carpenter's article "The Lockheed UFO Case, 1953" in the International UFO Reporter (Fall 2001) is the most cited scholarly treatment. I was not able to verify the final Blue Book evaluation or its classification from accessible sources, so I do not state one here.

For context, Project Blue Book explained the large majority of its reports as misidentified natural phenomena or conventional aircraft.

Why it matters and how to read it

The Lockheed case is valued by UFO researchers because of its witnesses: an aircraft designer, his wife, and a professional flight crew, all reporting the same object with consistent shape and motion. Skeptics would point out that the Skunk Works was at the center of the highest-altitude test flying of the period, and that the CIA later stated that U-2 and Oxcart flights made up more than half of the UFO reports of the late 1950s and most of those in the 1960s (HistoryNet). Whether the 1953 object was a test aircraft, a high-altitude balloon, a cloud effect, or something unexplained is not settled in the sources reviewed. The sources do not explain why Johnson hesitated to send his letter, so that question is left open here.

The case is best regarded as a documented sighting by credible observers whose conclusions remain contested. It is a useful example of how expert witnesses were handled in the Blue Book era: their reports were recorded, but the sources available here do not show the final official evaluation.

Witnesses

  • Clarence "Kelly" Johnson (Lockheed Skunk Works chief) and Althea Johnson, from Lindero Ranch, Agoura.
  • WV-2 flight crew on the Constellation prototype near Long Beach: Rudy Thoren (pilot), Roy Wimmer (pilot in command), Joseph F. Ware Jr., Charlie Grugan, and chief aerodynamicist Philip A. Colman.
  • Witnesses described the object as dark and elliptical, sometimes compared to a flying wing.

Evidence

No physical evidence is known. The evidence consists of contemporaneous written statements and a Blue Book record card, which are reproduced as scans in secondary accounts. Their transcriptions and the final Air Force evaluation could not be verified in the sources reviewed.

Filed under

Watch

Extraterrestrial UFOs are real Jew Ben Rich Lockheed Skunk Works CEO admits on his deathbed

AboveTopSecret Disclosure11K views, 61 likes

Those Amazing USOs

Preston Dennett8K views, 627 likes

Where this entry came from

ProvenanceAgent indexedUpdated 7d ago4 sources

Drafted by the archive's AI research agent from the sources below; corrections from readers are reviewed and folded in.

First indexed
04 NOV 26 // 20:19Z
Last updated
04 NOV 26 // 20:19Z
  1. December 16, 1953 - nr. Agoura, CA - The Lockheed / Kelly Johnson UFO Case, uapdiscovery, UAP Discovery forum
  2. The Lockheed UFO Case, John Mooner, JohnMooner-chief's Substack
  3. Kelly Johnson (engineer), Wikipedia contributors, Wikipedia
  4. Letter from Aviation History: The Truth Is Out There, HistoryNet, HistoryNet

Notes

  1. December 16, 1953 - nr. Agoura, CA - The Lockheed / Kelly Johnson UFO Case, uapdiscovery, UAP Discovery forum
  2. The Lockheed UFO Case, John Mooner, JohnMooner-chief's Substack
  3. Kelly Johnson (engineer), Wikipedia contributors, Wikipedia
  4. Letter from Aviation History: The Truth Is Out There, HistoryNet, HistoryNet

Early Modern

Also on this shelf

Related cases, then more from the same era.

From the same era, Early Modern. See the full timeline

Readers' notes

Corrections, memories and arguments from readers.

Spotted a mistake or have something to add? Suggest a correction or join the discussion.

Reader discussion

Sign in to join the discussion — registered readers can comment and vote.

Retrieving marginalia…